^^ANDREA99BOBAN^^

lunedì, 06 marzo 2006

C'E' GAS A BAGNACAVALLO (2) Con quaranta auto parcheggiate nel cantiere ENI di Longanesi-1 ed un sommesso rumore derivante forse dal generatore di corrente e non da una torcia in funzione, un drilling rig piuttosto vecchiotto portato dalla ditta di Alessandria che svolge i lavori e la fortuna che la stradina ghiaiata che passava di lì è stata asfaltata per l'occasione. Io comunque non credo che due società tra cui ENI si mettano a comprare campi che costano 30000 € all'ettaro per 500 mila Sm³/giorno. Per riferimento la Centrale di Minerbio ne pompa circa 40 milioni con punte di 63 milioni di Sm³/giorno. E si inizia già a parlare di subsidenza (!!) la ridicola questione di affondamento causa estrazione gas, c'è già uno "studio" che indica in 2 cm/anno l'affondamento cui andrà incontro Bagnacavallo. Ma è chiaramente solo un'arma politica. Secondo me non se ne fa niente.


Commenti
#1   06 Marzo 2006 - 13:28
 
Unfortunately, the translator isn't the clearest and so I was having difficulty in what you were saying. Would you be able to put that in English also :) thanks...!
utente anonimo

#2   06 Marzo 2006 - 16:05
 
Basically: noise from an electricity generator, no flaring yesterday, 40 cars in the parking (some ENI's). Some talks already about subsidence (sinking by 2 cm/year - silly "study"), but someone listens to it, so it's a political weapon against development. The reservoir of some 0.5 MMSCMD seems to me quite little: the storage facility in Minerbio pumps out 40 to 63 MMSCMD for example...I'm not sure about the possible development of Longanesi-1 AND Abbadesse-1. We'll see....
Blogger: Contattami Guarda il mediablog (foto, audio e video) di questo utente. Blocca questo utente andrea99boban

#3   06 Marzo 2006 - 16:44
 
Actually Abbadesse plan is for a 3 well program (currently only 1 well) which will be for a total of approx 20mmcf/d.
When Grove applied for the production permit they were asked by the authorities to work with ENI as their discovery may fall into ENI's land. Hence ENI drilled Longanesi to determine whether the discovery does and whether it would be viable to ENI. It sounds to me that .5 mm is not that much and I would think that ENI may pass leaving it to Grove for development (by the way..how did you find out about the .5/day?. The subsidence is a known issue and that is the reason why Abbadesse production numbers would be much lower so that it can be controlled....however like you said...I guess we shall see.
utente anonimo

#4   06 Marzo 2006 - 17:59
 
I thought I may also add...I did some conversion on the .5 MMSCMD as I assume when you are referring to this...this was the production rate of the test for Longanesi - if this is correct that would mean that 17.5 mmcf/d which is actually quite good...enough to make some good money. At 20mmcf/d for Grove we would be looking at approx 40 million Can $. If they put additional production on from Longanesi that would be even more....I'm just not sure I interpreted the .5 MMSCMD correctly.
utente anonimo

#5   07 Marzo 2006 - 06:51
 
No, in fact 0.5 MMSCMD was referred to Grove's Abbadesse-1, since I have no data about the Longanesi-1. You are right, the reservoir is not small, but there's the problem of "will all the bureaucracy and population doubts be bypassed?" And by the way, here in lower Romagna (Ravenna and Ferrara provinces) there is gas everywhere in the underground: in Ferrara province some people extract it by themselves stealing it to the state, one of them used to run its own greenhouse-business with self extracted gas! But no production wells are active now. Maybe they were considered too small.
Blogger: Contattami Guarda il mediablog (foto, audio e video) di questo utente. Blocca questo utente andrea99boban

#6   07 Marzo 2006 - 11:01
 
Thanks so much for the information..it's been very helpful. If you hear anything more, please post it. As always thanks!

J.
utente anonimo

Commenti

Chi sono

Blogger: andrea99boban
^^ANDREA99BOBAN^^ è una massa visibile di piccole goccioline o cristalli di ghiaccio sospesi nell'atmosfera, sopra la superficie terrestre o di un altro corpo planetario o un satellite. Possono formarsi strutture simili a ^^ANDREA99BOBAN^^ anche nello spazio interstellare, ma in questo caso non si tratta di agglomerati di gocce di vapore acqueo. Si parla in questo caso di ^^ANDREA99BOBAN^^ interstellari

Partecipano

Foto recenti

Bottoni

  • Contattami
  • Il mio profilo
  • Linkami


  • RSS 2.0
  • ATOM 0.3
  • Powered by Splinder

Contatore

visitato *loading* volte